False advertising....

What's with all the single guys posting public pics of some random chick they shagged once apon a time...... whose not part of the current/profile? Does she know she's on KS??

But I guess it gets you clicks/views you wouldn't otherwise get 🙄

Boo hiss guys....

Any picture of someone else doesn't have a place, even on a couples profile. Bad form, and legally sketchy.

I am a single older guy and I agree . I believe in being upfront same with descriptions . I try to be as honest as o can I am not good looking I am an older guy with the scars and body life gave me but I can guarantee to be honest polite respectful and I know my way around a woman's body lol . It's hard for a older single guy to get meets but I am not going to resort to net pics of others and fairy stories about conquests .that's just shit

I don't know why people start the lies straight away by lying on their prolfile...lying gets you nowhere except left out in the cold....

They definitely look more dubious to me if they have such pics....I always wonder if the female participant was a professional (nothing against that profession)....and if not, how old the pics are. Not relevant to the profile at all unless they are available to join...

I did report a photo once, a few years ago. I recognized a woman I knew from a single guys photo and I knew for a fact they weren't a couple.

The response I got wasn't helpful so I ended up contacting the woman offsite and letting her know.

The photo disappeared shortly after...

Quote by DrinkmePretty

Trophy pics, just trying to make themselves look like they are amazing. I think in most cases, other guys maybe impressed, but a lot of women will be turned off. So let them have them and feel good about themselves I guess.

There is a rule. People who are not part of the profile, should not be identifiable in any photos. If you think that's not the case, then please report the photo,

Counterpoint here. I think there is a place for all approaches on this site. Obviously everyone has what they look for and sounds like my profile wouldn't appeal to anyone on this forum profile. And that's fine... however, I'm not exactly sure how it's false advertising. The profile states SM, so why would anyone assume the female in any photos would be part of the package deal. And yeah, I'm while I have zero doubt there are a whole host of women on this site who are turned off... I can say there are a whole host of women who view said photos in a positive light. For instance, the photos can help separate the wanna-be's and the photo collectors, from those who are actually on this site to meet people for a bit of fun. It allows a couple to see what kind of play a particular profile enjoys, etc. Of course, this assumes that all photos on the profile are there with mutual consent... but that is a bit of a different issue. Again, just providing a bit of a counterpoint and not looking to get into any confrontation. I will say that KS does a better job of monitoring standards with regards to other people in photos. Pretty much all the US sites I've been a member of... any photo is pretty much fair game. Faces, bodies, etc... no policing it like on KS. Cheers.

Quote by sjjl71

Counterpoint here. I think there is a place for all approaches on this site. Obviously everyone has what they look for and sounds like my profile wouldn't appeal to anyone on this forum profile. And that's fine... however, I'm not exactly sure how it's false advertising. The profile states SM, so why would anyone assume the female in any photos would be part of the package deal. And yeah, I'm while I have zero doubt there are a whole host of women on this site who are turned off... I can say there are a whole host of women who view said photos in a positive light. For instance, the photos can help separate the wanna-be's and the photo collectors, from those who are actually on this site to meet people for a bit of fun. It allows a couple to see what kind of play a particular profile enjoys, etc. Of course, this assumes that all photos on the profile are there with mutual consent... but that is a bit of a different issue. Again, just providing a bit of a counterpoint and not looking to get into any confrontation. I will say that KS does a better job of monitoring standards with regards to other people in photos. Pretty much all the US sites I've been a member of... any photo is pretty much fair game. Faces, bodies, etc... no policing it like on KS. Cheers.

You make valid points. A lot of it is subjective as to if it is preferred. We had a SM who got really annoyed we turned him down because his profile had random woman all over it. The issue for us is the consent one. We can't know if the person/s in the photo/s consented to being displayed one someone's profile, and therefore we just red flag any profile with photos of others. If there is a sparse one with zero recognizable features, it might pass, but as a general rule we just ignore them.

Quote by elsecallers

You make valid points. A lot of it is subjective as to if it is preferred. We had a SM who got really annoyed we turned him down because his profile had random woman all over it. The issue for us is the consent one. We can't know if the person/s in the photo/s consented to being displayed one someone's profile, and therefore we just red flag any profile with photos of others. If there is a sparse one with zero recognizable features, it might pass, but as a general rule we just ignore them.

Yep, fully agree with you guys. Any SM profile showing sexual acts with someone else is pretty much guaranteed to get blocked by us. It's like they are showing off their conquests. We are almost certain they haven't gotten permission from the other person in the photo. But we are pretty strict on our preferences for SM. Even profiles with numerous Dick pics get ignored or blocked.

One thing we have noticed since joining is the amount of couples profiles where only the guy is active.

That to us seems more false.

That has always been the case on here. The female partner is always away or "taking a break "

The other one is the " Single male " who can only meet during weekdays, not in the evenings or weekends. Lol.

Yeah then claiming to be in an open relationship until you ask to then check with the partner hahahaha.

We're constantly trying to weed through the shit with who is actually legit. It is quite demoralizing to be fair. If you say you're going to do something, do it. If you're able to play alone, prove it.

There are the ones that also don't actually put up their status and get stroppy when you ask why. If SM were more honest then they might actually get laid hahahahahaha. It all comes down to trust. If we don't trust the profile, we will decline and block it.

I also have a SM profile on here. Hardly ever use it, but it is a paid up Gold membership, which goes a long way to saying you're legit. I clearly state that if people want to meet my wife to check if I'm being straight up then she's more than happy to meet for coffee.

Good points. Obviously (and you probably knew this was coming) all my photos are with permission from the couple. In fact, as a rule I don’t take photos unless it’s a couple I’m very comfortable with. So not only do I have zero control on what images/video are acquired during play… I’m dependent on the kindness of others to be allow to post. And NONE of the women:couples in my photos are “professionals” unless you count teachers, nurses, physicians, etc, as professionals.

And of course… the couples profiles where the wife is never available. Well, I’m sure most people’s bullshit detectors can sniff those out.

And honestly… those couples who don’t want to deal with any of that. Great. No offence. Just like no offended for those profiles with “NO SINGLE MALES” all over their profile. You pay for this product:service; use it however you want.

Quote by Intrepid

I also have a SM profile on here. Hardly ever use it, but it is a paid up Gold membership, which goes a long way to saying you're legit. I clearly state that if people want to meet my wife to check if I'm being straight up then she's more than happy to meet for coffee.

Paid up profiles are one thing but a single guy with disposable income can easily afford that. Am guessing in the end we are all just wanting honesty, pure and simple.

Quote by JRhavingfun

Paid up profiles are one thing but a single guy with disposable income can easily afford that. Am guessing in the end we are all just wanting honesty, pure and simple.

I think vouches might help if one is looking for a single:solo guy who is genuine. Others have already (hopefully) weeded out the BS for you.

Quote by sjjl71

I think vouches might help if one is looking for a single:solo guy who is genuine. Others have already (hopefully) weeded out the BS for you.

Yep, also have vouches on my SM profile. One of them from a site Mod so that must count for something 🙂

I know you are one of the legitimate guys on here because you have had a drinks date with Mrs Intrepid and you decided she wasn't for you. Which we fully respected. That does show integrity.

If you read some vouches and yes we have, its guys trying to give usernames etc. People trying to dodge paying etc.

We read lots and we will determine who will be right for us.

Back to the main thread though, there are way too many shysters on here.

Some very valid points from all , being a single guy myself I find that frustrating also as many single women dont have friend options on so making vouches idifficult to make

Well again a vouch is another way for a guy to put his stamp on there as another trophy. We can see why some women would choose not to have that option. SM do spoil it for themselves sadly.

Well… many couples only approach me BECAUSE of said vouches. And if I recall, many party and meet&greet advertisements state SM’s will be considered/invited only if they have photos and vouches. It takes two to tango with regards to the vouches. A guy cannot write his own vouch.

And single women - from what I’ve heard from the few SF’s I’m friends with - clearly have a different avenue with regards to communication on here. I’ve had a friend who just wanted to browse after coming back. They only had a female profile with no photos and little writing. And they STILL got messages and “cock shots”. So I can see why they don’t want/need vouches. Like comparing apples to panda bears.

Quote by sjjl71

Well… many couples only approach me BECAUSE of said vouches. And if I recall, many party and meet & greet advertisements state SM’s will be considered/invited only if they have photos and vouches. It takes two to tango with regards to the vouches. A guy cannot write his own vouch.

You would be amazed at what some guys do, some go to great lengths. Have heard of one making up a few profiles, vouching on his and then delete that profile, so vouches show but against an unknown user.

Quote by sjjl71

Good points. Obviously (and you probably knew this was coming) all my photos are with permission from the couple. In fact, as a rule I don’t take photos unless it’s a couple I’m very comfortable with. So not only do I have zero control on what images/video are acquired during play… I’m dependent on the kindness of others to be allow to post. And NONE of the women:couples in my photos are “professionals” unless you count teachers, nurses, physicians, etc, as professionals.

And of course… the couples profiles where the wife is never available. Well, I’m sure most people’s bullshit detectors can sniff those out.

That's right .. and you are totally honest and respectful about that ... goes a long way with us

Single girl here. I don't mind seeing photos of girls on SM's profiles. I wouldnt want to see anything too compromising of her though, lets keep it classy people. After all you are advertising the guys wares, not hers. I just have to assume they have permission to post the photos. And I wouldn't touch a guy that didn't have any vouches. It's the only way to get legitimacy. And if they were all 'unknown user' I would discount them. I've deleted vouches off my profile before, if I feel like the guy is using me to make himself look better.

All my content is taken with consent from both parties. And generally taken by the guy and I have no problem with them using it - as long as it’s not on a subscription or pay per view. I have been asked not to show identifying pics at times - or not to show them publicly which I’m more than happy to do.

Maybe for yourselves but when it comes to consenting friendly adults we will post whatever and with whoever we like on our swingers profile… nothing legally sketchy at all.

Quote by elsecallers

Any picture of someone else doesn't have a place, even on a couples profile. Bad form, and legally sketchy.